APOCALYPSE ON EARTH: BONDAGEFREAK SURVIVAL GAME I & II (M/M) *NEW GAME* SEPT 30

[Tsuhaya]

Well, they were difficult choices, all guys have their qualities. That said, I was left with a team of:

Mitch
Nick
Shawn
Ryan
Steven
Jeremy
Ethan

7+6+5+4+1+1+1= 25

For me, this team is well-balanced, has the muscles to acquire resources and maintain order, and also has subs to keep the environment pleasant and organized.

[bondagefreak]

@Tsuhaya

MITCH
NICK
SHAWN
RYAN
STEVEN
JEREMY
ETHAN
YOURSELF

ADVANTAGES: Medium-large party. Excellent amount of brawn & muscle (with yourself greatly helping in that regard). Overall good experience with very high capture & restrain skills (Mitch, Nick, Ryan & to a lesser degree Shawn). Numerous providers with numerous dependents to cook, clean and take care of more menial & domestic tasks. Two level-headed providers with strong fatherly instincts. Two brawny backup providers (Shawn/Ryan). One brawny guy (you) to keep your fellow-dependents in line. Resourceful members (Steven). Friendship bonds (Nick/Shawn, Steven/Jeremy). Parity between dependants and providers.

DISADVANTAGES: NONE


OVERALL SCORE (BONDAGEFREAK'S RATING): A+

A - Very high survivability
B - High survivability
C - Medium survivability
D - Low survivability
E - Very low survivabilty

[OrdinaryWorld]

Heh, had a feeling Tsuhaya's team would get a very high rating

[Tsuhaya]

@Tsuhaya

MITCH
NICK
SHAWN
RYAN
STEVEN
JEREMY
ETHAN
YOURSELF

ADVANTAGES: Medium-large party. Excellent amount of brawn & muscle (with yourself greatly helping in that regard). Overall good experience with very high capture & restrain skills (Mitch, Nick, Ryan & to a lesser degree Shawn). Numerous providers with numerous dependents to cook, clean and take care of more menial & domestic tasks. Two level-headed providers with strong fatherly instincts. Two brawny backup providers (Shawn/Ryan). One brawny guy (you) to keep your fellow-dependents in line. Resourceful members (Steven). Friendship bonds (Nick/Shawn, Steven/Jeremy). Parity between dependants and providers.

DISADVANTAGES: NONE


OVERALL SCORE (BONDAGEFREAK'S RATING): A+

A - Very high survivability
B - High survivability
C - Medium survivability
D - Low survivability
E - Very low survivabilty

Happy that my team has a high chance of survival, I tried my best to be sensible and at the same time get who I wanted for my team, and modesty, I'm very versatile in my own use on the team

[bondagefreak]

I tried my best to be sensible and at the same time get who I wanted for my team, and modestly, I'm very versatile in my own use on the team.

Indeed you are. I knew as much, hence the exceptionally high score your team garnered.
You'd be a great backup for Shawn & Ryan, sort of like a hunkier (and probably more compassionate) Andrew

I really have to ask though, since you created a team composed of four dominant guys and four submissive ones, what would the breakdown look like? Would you guys be paired off?

[Tsuhaya]

I tried my best to be sensible and at the same time get who I wanted for my team, and modestly, I'm very versatile in my own use on the team.

Indeed you are. I knew as much, hence the exceptionally high score your team garnered.
You'd be a great backup for Shawn & Ryan, sort of like a hunkier (and probably more compassionate) Andrew

I really have to ask though, since you created a team composed of four dominant guys and four submissive ones, what would the breakdown look like? Would you guys be paired off?

Well, I believe that Nick and Steven are an almost unanimous choice couple, even though it's a scenario that I can control, I think the two have too good a dynamic to throw out the window. Mitch and Ethan is a match choice for me, they already know each other and I think Ethan suits a more experienced dominant, he's practically a Sub brat.

I admit that the last two pairs made me enter into a long internal discussion to decide, since it concerns my destiny. I really like Shawn and Ryan; they both have pros and cons in their personalities. At the end decided to pair up with Ryan, I considered a few things before making that decision. Firstly, Ryan has more practice tying someone up. I don't want to say that Shawn is bad at it, but Ryan knows exactly what to do when it comes to tying someone up. Personally, I find Ryan a little more attractive than Shawn. I believe Ryan's socks would be less toxic to me since Shawn is almost on the same level as Nick when it comes to foot odor. And finally, Shawn and Jeremy would be an interesting pair, I don't remember seeing these two interact when it comes to Dom/Sub, at least not directly.

[bondagefreak]

@Tsuhaya Interesting answers! There is a sizeable hole in your response though. Ethan and Mitch don't just know each other - Ethan is Mitch's son! No way you can pair the two of them up Mitch would need his own sub-spouse and Ethan would need a dominant spouse of his own. Jeremy might have to be paired with Mitch and Ethan with Shawn.

Personally, if I were to arrange your group it would look like this:

Mitch & Jeremy - perfect as Jeremy has never had a father figure in his life
Nick & Steven - self explanatory, as you already mentioned
Ryan & Ethan - both are playful, quirky and have compatible energy
Shawn & you - out of all these guys, I would see you matching up with Shawn the most.

Just my two cents.

[Tsuhaya]

@Tsuhaya Interesting answers! There is a sizeable hole in your response though. Ethan and Mitch don't just know each other - Ethan is Mitch's son! No way you can pair the two of them up Mitch would need his own sub-spouse and Ethan would need a dominant spouse of his own. Jeremy might have to be paired with Mitch and Ethan with Shawn.

Personally, if I were to arrange your group it would look like this:

Mitch & Jeremy - perfect as Jeremy has never had a father figure in his life
Nick & Steven - self explanatory, as you already mentioned
Ryan & Ethan - both are playful, quirky and have compatible energy
Shawn & you - out of all these guys, I would see you matching up with Shawn the most.

Just my two cents.

Damn! I don't know why, but I had clear memories that Bob was Ethan's father. There's something wrong with me
I can use as an excuse that I read Ethan's story almost a year ago

Overall, with this change, I believe that the most coherent pairs are the ones you, sir, mentioned

[bondagefreak]

Just a quick post to let you guys know I had the mods move this thread from the RP section over into the TUG Talk section.

I didn't know this at the time, but I found out not long ago that the RP section has an in-built mechanism that automatically deletes threads after a short period of inactivity. Hence why so many of our group RPs/Games from previous years have disappeared without a trace.

[bondagefreak]

Might be fun to revisit this RP-game concept but with expanded options (more character choices) and an improved points/cost system. Frank could be replaced with Jeff, and guys like Chad, Hunter, Brody and Matt could even be added into the mix.

Lots of new readers and users have signed up since the dawning of this game.
Feel free to participate. This thread remains open to any would-be participant.

[ChairBoy]

I know im late but I still am super curious.
there is a large part of me who thinks maybe it would be wise to just use only 7 credits and just go with bob. I think that would honestly increase my odds especially if I was acting up and would be best for my character in the long run, and less food and supplies to need.
but if I were to use all available credits here's my answer.

bob 7pts
Mitch 7pts
frank 7pts
Zack 6pts
Corey 4pts
Big Mike 4pts

oh crap.. that's more than 25...

then I would go with bob Mitch and frank and Corey.
solid group of older men and one younger man to keep me in my okay.. but missing Zack in the mix may be a sad reality I may need to face... but the option of only bob or just bob and Mitch might be a good one to consider for my case personally

[bondagefreak]

@ChairBoy

BOB
MITCH
FRANK
COREY
YOURSELF

ADVANTAGES: Good overall experience and brawn with very high capture & restrain skills (Mitch, Bob, Frank and to a lesser degree Corey). Level-headed providers with strong fatherly instincts. Very brawny backup provider.

DISADVANTAGES: Tiny-sized party. Limited manpower. Limited pairs of hands and eyes. Lack of younger, high-stamina/brawny backup leaders. Extremely limited pairing-off opportunities. Lack of parity between providers and dependents.


OVERALL SCORE (BONDAGEFREAK'S RATING): C

A - Very high survivability
B - High survivability
C - Medium survivability
D - Low survivability
E - Very low survivabilty